Utter Frustration

We spent the weekend at my parents place on the Eastern Shore, and Sunday, even though the weather was marginal, we went over to Assateague to do some shooting.

What I ended up with was 229 exposures that were utter crap. To say that I am frustrated is an understatement.

Here’s an example. This is a crop of one of the shots, just as it came from the camera. Flat, lifeless … and SOFT! WTF?!? Almost every picture I shot was not sharp. What on Earth could cause a camera that had been behaving at least reasonably well (with the exception of the low-light noise issue) to turn to complete junk?

As it turns out, nearly every one of my custom settings for image quality had be reset somehow. This includes things like in-camera sharpening, tonality, color curves and saturation. This is not something that I would have purposefully done. A complete camera reset like this requires either finding a paperclip and pushing in a tiny button on the camera bottom, or, digging around for the “menu reset” option and at least one screen confirming that I really wanted to blow off all my camera settings.

Thank goodness I shoot RAW files, because if I had been shooting JPEGs, the whole day would have been a photographic waste. The image above right has been processed in Nikon Capture and had the camera settings I usually use applied. While it’s still not a great image (gray bird on a gray day makes for gray image), it’s a lot closer to what I expect to see from my D70s — sharp, detailed images with decent color (a little hard to judge in this image, but…).

Post Revisions:

There are no revisions for this post.

Comments (5)

DeanApril 2nd, 2007 at 11:15 pm

Have you figured out what caused your camera to do that?? We own a Nikon D50. It is a terrific camera…although it seems like I have a hard time convincing people that it is a better choice than a Canon. Visit us at http://chincoteaguevacations.com Dean

GerenApril 3rd, 2007 at 6:55 am

Dean,

No, I haven’t figured out why this happened.

As to which is better, Canon or Nikon, it really does depend largely on your usage.

Canons have, historically, done better in high ISO/low light situations, or for images with a lot of information in shadow areas. Close scrutiny of the test images on various web sites will prove that out.

ThomApril 3rd, 2007 at 7:15 am

yadda,yadda,yadda…………and the beat goes on……….. :-)

GerenApril 3rd, 2007 at 7:25 am

LOL! Yes, it does.

ThomApril 3rd, 2007 at 9:35 am

Thanks for the Rockwell reminder……..hadn’t been there for awhile…………I’ve made a few changes in my setting and I think they are going to work fine…………………will see. Shooting County Exce. Jim Smith today for the paper.
Lookimg forward to the results…..thanks again.

Leave a comment

Your comment

Copy Protected by WP-CopyProtect Thanks to Chetan.